AEBOS_STANDALONE_01 · RFPRelay

Got a live enterprise deal slowed by a security questionnaire?

For lean SaaS/IT teams handling their first few or occasional reviews: separate reusable approved evidence from questions that need security, engineering, legal or sales review, then surface unsupported claims before diligence stalls the sale.

24-Hour RFP & Security Questionnaire Triage · $149 founding priceBid/no-bid clarity · approved-evidence gaps · SME ownership · deadlines · response outline

Request an RFP fit check

No payment is collected here. Submit only business information you are comfortable sharing.

Join RFPRelay email updates through the project-owned consent path. The dedicated MailerLite signup form is not presented until its activation is verified.

Aggregate funnel telemetry loading…

Boundaries: no legal advice, no invented claims or certifications, no award guarantee, and no submission on your behalf.

Submitting this form adds the address to this project’s suppression list. It does not affect messages or lists from any other project.

Free 10-point diagnostic

Security questionnaire readiness scorecard for lean SaaS & IT teams

Score one point for each YES before drafting. The goal is to learn whether an occasional diligence request can be handled with a disciplined evidence-and-owner map before adding more software or pulling engineers into repetitive response work.

  1. Is one person accountable for the questionnaire from intake to buyer handoff?
  2. Have all required questions, attachments and deadlines been extracted?
  3. Do we have an approved source for security and company claims rather than relying on memory?
  4. Can each reusable answer be traced to current evidence such as policy, architecture, audit or product documentation?
  5. Can we separate reusable approved answers from questions that genuinely need an SME?
  6. Does every SME-only question have a named security, engineering, legal, sales or delivery owner?
  7. Have unsupported, stale or contradictory claims been flagged before drafting?
  8. Is there a reviewer who can approve sensitive answers before they leave the company?
  9. Can we identify evidence that could answer future buyer questions without exposing restricted material?
  10. Can we explain whether this request is frequent enough to justify dedicated response software versus a lighter operating process?
8–10 Structured5–7 Response risk exists0–4 Fix process before adding tooling
Low score or one critical unknown?

Use the fit check above to identify the first decision, evidence gap or SME dependency worth resolving. For a deeper walkthrough, use the dedicated bid/no-bid guide or map the SME dependencies before assigning work.

Request a fit check · Use the security evidence checklist · Read the bid/no-bid scorecard guide · Map SME dependencies